[For a quick and basic understanding of sound proofing please read our soundproofing 101 article first.]
During your research on the topic of soundproofing, you
have almost certainly come across the term decoupling. Decoupling
means mechanically separating the two sides of a wall to make it harder
for sound to pass through the wall. Here is a simple example of
decoupling two sheets of drywall.
Here we show a simple sketch of how wood studs couple the
conventional wall, and how products like resilient channel or resilient sound clips can decouple it and improve performance.
 |
|
 |
|
The stiffness of wood studs couples the two sides of a conventional
wall. As a result, sound can easily pass from one side, through the
studs, to the other side.
Sound can pass through this type of wall without going through the
air and the insulation, so insulation has only a limited effect on the
single wood stud wall.
|
By including a resilient decoupling mount, the sound that tries to
pass to the other side via the structure is thwarted, and performance
can improve.
Because sound cannot easily pass through the structure, it has to
pass through the air cavity, and insulation becomes far, far more
effective.
|
Part 2 – Decoupling and Resonance
When you move two sheets of drywall apart you do improve things, but only at some frequencies.
What happens is that the air in the cavity of the decoupled wall
acts like a spring, and like all mass-on-a-spring systems, this results
in a resonance. At (and around) this resonance point, the performance
of the decoupled wall is actually considerably worse than if no
decoupling had been used. Like this:
In theory (and in lab tests and in the field), decoupling only helps
well above the low frequency resonance. In this case, with a resonance
of 63 Hz, the decoupling only helps above 100 Hz, and hurts performance
below this frequency. Let’s take a look at an actual lab test exactly
as above.

One of the lines to the left is 4 layers of 1/2” drywall as a solid slab with no air cavity.
The other line is the same drywall, but with 2 layers on each side of a 2x4 wall with resilient channel and insulation.
As predicted above, what we observe is large gains at higher frequencies, but performance losses at lower frequencies.
This is caused by the resonance intrinsic to decoupled walls. To
attain both the tremendous high frequency performance of decoupling and
good low frequency performance, we will have to address this resonance
problem somehow.
Attaining good low frequency performance: Part 1 - Lowering resonance frequency
To attain good low frequency isolation with a decoupled partition,
we will have to handle the resonance somehow. The first method that we
can use is to cause the wall to resonate at lower frequencies. To do this we
have to:
a) Add mass to one or both sides of the wall e.g. another layer of drywall (heavier decoupled walls have lower resonance frequencies).
b) Increase the depth of the air cavity.
c) Add insulation (if no insulation is currently present).
The benefits of lowering resonance are two-fold:
1) The frequency range where the wall performs poorly moves down
to frequencies that the human ear can’t hear as well, which reduces disturbance.
2) The frequency range where the decoupling is effective becomes
wider – your decoupling efforts work on the lower frequencies as well.
Notice
how, as the frequency of resonance goes down, performance at frequencies
important to theater, music, traffic, aircraft, and the human ear are
greatly improved.
It’s a lot better to have a 20 Hz problem than a 40 Hz problem, or to have a 40 Hz problem than an 80 Hz problem!
If your resonance is high in frequency, your decoupling
efforts may make things WORSE, not better. For example, you would be
better off for almost any application to use two layers of drywall
sandwiched tightly together than you would to use two layers of drywall
separated by one inch.
Later in this document we will go over some basic tips for lowering
resonance and attaining good all-around performance. Next, we’ll look
at our other option for dealing with resonance – damping it with
viscoelastic materials.
Attaining good low frequency performance: Part 2 - Viscoelastic damping
We saw above that conventional decoupled systems have considerable
performance dips at resonance. It has been demonstrated in lab tests
that products like Green Glue, have a substantial positive effect at
resonance on conventional, coupled walls. The same benefits are
observed to the same extent on decoupled walls such as double stud
walls. By an enormous margin, pound for pound the best wall that you
can build is a visco-elastically (e.g. Green Glue) damped double stud wall.
Table – choosing the right decoupling system for low frequency performance.
|
Best decoupling
selections for walls |
For conventional (non-damped) drywall |
For well damped drywall (such as Green Glue damped board) |
|
Best type of decoupling |
Double stud wall |
Double stud wall |
|
2nd best |
Modern sound clips like Whisper Clip |
Staggered studs |
|
3rd best |
Staggered studs |
Sound clips |
|
4th best |
Resilient channel |
Wood or metal furring channel (not resilient) |
|
5th best |
Wood or metal furring channel (not resilient) perpendicular to the studs at 24” on-center |
Resilient channel |
|
Best decoupling selections for floor/ceiling constructions |
For conventional (non-damped) drywall |
For well damped drywall (such as Green Glue damped board) |
|
Best type of decoupling |
Separate ceiling joists (true room within a room) |
Separate ceiling joists (true room within a room) |
|
|
|
|
2nd best |
Modern sound clips |
Sound clips |
|
3rd best |
Resilient channel |
Resilient channel or non-resilient
wood or metal furring |
Tips that are invaluable when planning a decoupled partition:
1. Use as much mass as possible on each side of the wall.
2. Always use double drywall on at least one side of the wall.
3. Use as deep an air space as possible.
4. Use insulation. Fluffy fiberglass insulation is as good as anything.
5. Select modern sound clips such as Whisper Clip over resilient channel (lower resonance point).
6. Select double stud walls over anything (lowest resonance point).
7. Use Green Glue damping compound.
8. Choose thicker, heavier drywall over thinner – i.e., use all 5/8” drywall if possible
Construction diagrams
These should be helpful to anybody wondering what, for example, a double stud wall is.
 |
 |
 |
|
Conventional wall (coupled)
|
Staggered stud wall. Shown
is 2x4 studs offset on a
2x6 base plate
|
Double stud walls. Two
separate rows of studs with
drywall only on the outside
|
Resilient Channel
Resilient channel is a thin, flexible metal channel that is screwed
to the studs. Drywall is then screwed to the channel, and the
flexibility of the channel creates a decoupled wall.
Sound Clip
Sound clips are typically rubber-containing devices that screw to
the studs of your wall. Metal hat channel is then inserted into the
clips, and drywall is screwed into the hat channel. These provide
decoupling by virtue of the resilient rubber component of the clips
that ultimately supports the weight of the drywall. Newer sound clips
like the Whisper Clip featured on our soundproofing site provide resiliency
through their distinct design providing a higher rating than their rubber counterparts.
Conclusion:
Decoupling is an extremely powerful tool, and can raise the STC extremely efficiently.
Ultimately, every truly great sound isolation scheme will utilize some
type of decoupling.
However, decoupling is not effective at all frequencies. In fact,
decoupling a wall results in reduced low frequency performance around
its resonance point, and is only effective at frequencies much higher
than resonance. Thus, to lower the frequency where wall performance is
weak and maximize the frequency range over which decoupling helps you,
you should strive to have resonance as low as possible.
The combination of viscoelastic damping and decoupling is extremely
potent – giving the benefits of decoupling without the drawbacks.
Click here to see our Soundproofing Materials.
|